Those two VT articles from 2013 Exposing the Snowden-Assange “Whistleblower Limited Hangouts”

First off, I do not know exactly why this has been so “blockbustery” in my mind, but I’ve felt like tonnes of stuff was opening up about this thing called “limited hangouts“, in particular with Edward Snowden (and Julian Assange).

So I got my mocha yesterday, but instead of reading the Ian Greenhalgh Russian report article, I read the two VT articles that were published shortly after the Ed Snowden NSA-spying-on-everybody revelations came out (on 6-6-13). I paid no attention to these at the time, as I was just starting out the 2013 Turtle Island Journey, and was likely having coffee at Bellano Coffee (coffee artwork here).

I’m posting the titles of those two articles and a few highlights from each. For myself, this information has been very “mind opening” as to how the NWO (CIA, USA CORP, etc.) creates and uses “limited hangout ‘whistleblowers'” for its own (nefarious) purposes. Take a look at these articles and see if you now view the whole “Edward Snowden” (and Julian Assange) affair in a brand new light.

Snowden, CIA Shill? (How to identify CIA limited hangout op?) (GPD (Webster Tarpley) 6-18-16)

“The operations of secret intelligence agencies aiming at the manipulation of public opinion generally involve a combination of cynical deception with the pathetic gullibility of the targeted populations. There is ample reason to believe that the case of Edward Joseph Snowden fits into this pattern. We are likely dealing here with a limited hangout operation, in which carefully selected and falsified documents and other materials are deliberately revealed by an insider who pretends to be a fugitive rebelling against the excesses of some oppressive or dangerous government agency.

“Any attempt to educate public opinion about the dynamics of limited hangout operations inevitably collides with the residue left in the minds of millions by recent successful examples of this technique. It will be hard for many to understand Snowden, precisely because they will insist on seeing him as the latest courageous example in a line of development which includes Daniel Ellsberg and Julian Assange, both still viewed by large swaths of naïve opinion as authentic challengers of oppressive government.

“…limited hangouts have been around for a very long time. In 1620 Fra Paolo Sarpi, the dominant figure of the Venetian intelligence establishment of his time, advised the Venetian senate that the best way to defeat anti-Venetian propaganda was indirectly.

“The most obvious characteristic of the limited hangout operative is that he or she immediately becomes the darling of the controlled corporate media.… Snowden has already become a media celebrity of the first magnitude. His career was launched by the US left liberal Glenn Greenwald, now writing for the London Guardian, which expresses the viewpoints of the left wing of the British intelligence community. Thus, the current scandal is very much Made in England, and may benefit from inputs from the British GCHQ of Cheltenham…

[article header titles]
“Limited hangouts contain little that is new
Limited hangouts reveal nothing about big issues like JFK, 9/11
The Damascus road conversions of limited hangout figures
Limited hangouts prepare large covert operations

“If the Snowden operation can help coerce the vacillating and reluctant Obama to attack Syria, our new autistic hero may claim credit for starting a general war in the Middle East, and perhaps even more. If Snowden can further poison relations between United States and China, the world historical significance of his provocations will be doubly assured. But none of this can occur unless he finds vast legions of eager dupes ready to fall for his act. We hope he won’t.”

Fake and Faker: Assange and Snowden (GPD 7-8-16)

” A good con-man must win the people’s confidence before he makes his sting. By exposing a certain amount of wasteful military spending and U.S. brutality (limited hangout), Assange’s WikiLeaks wins the trust of many liberty loving, justice seeking Americans, as well as Europeans and Arabs. He is also condemned by certain U.S. politicians & journalists. This condemnation (some of it feigned, some of it genuine) is known in intelligence circles as “sheep-dipping”, and also serves to build his credibility.

“After gaining the world’s trust with his controlled attacks against the U.S. government, Assange, a CIA (and/or Mossad) operative, aims his WikiLeaks whistle-blowing weapon at the true intended targets. Leaked documents no longer embarrass America. But very damaging information about corruption within the governments of Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen are “leaked” to “assets” within the Arab press.

“The NWO Gang’s formula for conducting “regime change” within the targeted states is as follows:
STEP 1: Assange’s WikiLeaks feeds very embarassing leaks to “assets” within the Arab press.
STEP 2: The targeted regime suddenly becomes very unpopular.
STEP 3: Internal subversives (provacateurs) kick off the “spontaneous demonstrations”.
STEP 4: Ordinary citizens swell the ranks of the protestors.
STEP 5: Paid traitors within the government and military force the government to resign. 5a: (In Libya & Syria, paid terrorist mercenaries (“rebels”) fight against the loyal military.)
STEP 6: The MSM then claims that “people power” has triumphed over tyranny.
Amnesty International hails WikiLeaks and Guardian as Arab spring ‘catalysts’

“Exactly as was the case with Assange, Snowden becomes a “fugitive”. No explanation is given as to how he managed to escape, or how a fugitive was able to get on a plane. Snowden flees to CIA-infested Hong Kong where his “cause” is supported by a bizarre instant flash-mob equipped with professionally made bi-lingual banners and picket signs!“