Remarks on David Wilcock's Latest Article (of 6-29-12)

I’ve noticed a few articles and blog posts about David’s last piece, so I put a couple below and links. Thanks to JHaines and Steve Beckow and whoever else could be thanked here!
From JHaines:
http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2012/06/29/the-green-light-wouldnt-it-be-nice-by-david-wilcock-and-thanks-to-dd/

Posted on June 29, 2012
I have never before ‘called’ someone of David’s stature on his words, but I am going to do it now, because I know the great respect in which we all hold David. What I feel from David’s words is that not only has he been out of the loop, but that very understandably during these last months he has gone through a great deal of trauma, which is affecting his ability to see clearly. My suggestion to David would be to clear these traumas from his being, rest, relax, and get back to us. I think he’s calling this wrong.
David is very human, and he’s already done more for us than we have a right to expect. If you can agree with me that this doesn’t sound like the David we know, admire, and love, let’s cut him some slack and hope that he does take time to get the rest he evidently knows he needs. ~J

Read full article…
From Steve Beckow:
http://the2012scenario.com/2012/06/is-drake-being-set-up/

Rather than simply dismissing Drake out of hand at that time, we might want to consider that he was, in this instance, being set up by the cabal for their own purposes. The cabal created a huge “national-security state” and many people are probably still employed there spinning endless destructive scenarios like this.
So I do want to caution us against acting like lightworker lemmings. The dark depends on us being simply interested in the truth. If they’ve set Drake up and then pull the trap shut, they rely on us to act like truth robots and pile on Drake because what he said has proven not to be the truth. We won’t make a subtle distinction like seeing that Drake was set up. Or we may see it and think he should have known better…
Channeled sources are not “me too” commentators. That characterization does not fit for me. The beings whom he lauds in other columns as “management” and “Heaven” are far, far more reliable and far more central to the decision-making process than any insider David is in contact with.
Their information is not “10-15 percent accurate.” It is far more accurate than that, although even they are not the decision-makers, but only spokespeople for the decision makers, and so the information they give out may also be subject to changes – as we have seen in the past. For instance, SaLuSa is a spokesman for the Galactic Federation. He is not the higher council that makes the decisions.
It’s a wee bit disheartening to hear David say that he receives a great deal of toxic email and is impacted by it and that he watches cabalist journalists and paid bloggers undermine courageous truth-tellers and then hear him turn around and do the same to channelers.

Read full article…