Steve Beckow…”Confusion, Frenzy, and the Need for Discernment”

There are a number of events, chaotic appearing happenings, energies, and other things going on right now, that I feel it is important to stay grounded, and in touch with our individual Higher Selves. Steve has put an article together that expresses this. Here are a couple of paragraphs that stood out for me.

Whipping up frenzied anger against anyone, in my opinion, has no place in the new world that we’re building. I won’t be publicizing sensationalist treatments of the various matters we all know about and want to end (sexual molestation, genocide, World War III, antichrists, etc.). Justice is not served by extremism or sensationalism…

Because lightworkers are committed to redressing wrongs and defending the right, they’re sometimes “played” by those who know how to turn level heads into a mob. Justice can be derailed not only by the black hats but also by white hats who have their own agenda, such as making a name for themselves or feeling powerful through causing a sensation. I can think of three lightworkers right off the bat who seem more interested in establishing a place in history than in being wise, circumspect and just.

If something sounds extreme, I’d question it. The really trustworthy voices, I think, are not to be found on the extremes, but in the middle, in a balanced weighing of things and calm deliberation.

the link to Steve’s article.

—————————————————————————

Confusion, Frenzy, and the Need for Discernment
by Steve Beckow, June 26, 2011

I feel the need to comment on a number of things.

I had not watched the third part of James Rinks’ three-part video before posting it and did not therefore see his allegations against Obama. I’m not familiar with where these allegations may stem from but I don’t put any credence in them. I have therefore taken the Rinks video down and won’t be posting more of his work.

There are a number of rumors floating around the Net and I won’t be publishing the articles which contain them. I’ll refer to them here without naming the authors. My aim is to avoid a light war but nevertheless to address the allegations.

One of these is that Greys and Dracos have joined forces to start World War III. According to my sources, the Greys and the Dracos have not been around the planet for seven years. Moreover, according to Matthew and SaLuSa, no one can or will start World War III.

A second is that Prince William is the Antichrist, an allegation which is supported by showing a photo of him holding a lamb and pointing the cloven hoofs at the camera. I asked Archangel Michael about this in my last reading and he said that Prince William is not the Antichrist or anything of the sort. Some of you may not find my assertion that I asked an archangel for verification and I’m fine with your not accepting my assertion if that’s the case. Discernment is called for with all information.

A third allegation is that, if we board spaceships after Disclosure, we’ll be kidnapped, taken to Mars and enslaved. I asked AAM if this allegation had any truth or basis in fact to it and he replied “absolutely not.”

A final allegation is that the Pope and Queen have been “summoned” to answer to charges relating to child sexual abuse and native genocide. The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) is the forum to which the Queen and Pope have been summoned.

What we need to remember is that the ITCCS is not a court of law. It has no basis or standing in law. To the best of my knowledge it would not be accurate to believe that this “Tribunal” can subpoena the Queen or the Pope, try them, or bring down sentence against them. Of course, the ITCCS does not use the word “supboena” or the word “summonsed.” Instead they say “summoned.” To summon someone is not to be confused with the legal processes indicated by the words “subpoenaed” or “summonsed.”

To represent the situation otherwise or to write in a manner that does not clearly state the difference between the two processes and invites the public to think a legal process is involved is, in my opinion, deceptive and lacks integrity.

I’m aware that some of the judicial and legislative processes in some countries has been undermined. But there are also elements of it that have not and I don’t consider the pure principles of the legal systems of most western countries to be themselves corrupt.

The ITCCS describes its authority, process, and aims thus:

“[The ITCCS is] a de jure Court and a popular forum to address grievances, crimes and consequences …

“The final verdicts and findings of the Court and Tribunal will be made public in the form of a final public Report whose decisions will be enforced by the Common law Peace Officers and their agents, if regular peace officers refuse to do so. These decisions can and will include the imprisonment and community sentencing of the guilty, the issuing of commercial Liens and Orders of Expropriation against church, corporate and state institutions and their property and assets, orders of Reparation and Compensation, and the return of all land, property, unpaid taxes, and revenue obtained through forced labor.

“Our Court and tribunal derive their ultimate authority from the self-evident Natural Law which resides within the reason and compassion of every man and woman, and from the Common Law right of the informed citizenry to establish their own Courts, Policing and Laws when normal institutions fail or refuse to uphold the liberty, rights, safety and well being of the community.

“Issued by the Legal Advisory Committee of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State – January 3, 2011.” (1)

The use of the term “de jure,” which simply means “according to law” or “by right” sounds impressive, but it does not indicate a legal court. The ITCCS goes on to call itself “a popular forum” and that is more to the point. So for us to jump to the conclusion that the Queen and the Pope are going on trial is unwarranted and will only turn out in the end to be seen as untrue and leave us looking careless.

Before I end, I also need to remind people to check out any story that begins by saying a special report on some subject has been handed to Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. In addition check any report that issues from the EU Times. Both of these telltale signs point to the report being from Sorcha Faal (i.e., David Booth). The simplest way to check that out is to go to Faal’s website, http://www.whatdoesitmean.com and see if the report is to be found there. If it is, chances are the whole article or a major part of it is fallacious. I continue to see a number of lightworkers distributing articles that hail from Faal and passing them around does no one any good.

I’m as eager as anyone to see the cabal defeated, obliged to step down and turn matters over to the Company of Light (the galactics and the spiritual hierarchy). But if we say things are true that are not true, we set ourselves up for major debunking and a loss of credibility. That to me is not advisable or desirable.

Whatever crimes have been committed, the Company of Light have painstakingly prepared dossiers on and will be bringing those concerned to the bar of the International Criminal Court where they’ll be tried according to the highest standards of justice, using evidence that is irrefutable, and receiving legal sanctions which are fair and just. Proceeding in that manner will leave no karmic residue and will yield a stable and permanent solution rather than an unstable and temporary one.

Whipping up frenzied anger against anyone, in my opinion, has no place in the new world that we’re building. I won’t be publicizing sensationalist treatments of the various matters we all know about and want to end (sexual molestation, genocide, World War III, antichrists, etc.). Justice is not served by extremism or sensationalism.

To be justice, it must, in my opinion, be even-handed, dispassionate, and careful. It must err on the side of caution. It must constantly be weighed against well-established legal principles, standards, tests, and precedent, not because there is something inherently wise in doing so but because it provides tests of the wisdom of the decisions reached by the court. Much good flies out the window when people whip up public opinion, no matter how worthy the end may be.

Because lightworkers are committed to redressing wrongs and defending the right, they’re sometimes “played” by those who know how to turn level heads into a mob. Justice can be derailed not only by the black hats but also by white hats who have their own agenda, such as making a name for themselves or feeling powerful through causing a sensation. I can think of three lightworkers right off the bat who seem more interested in establishing a place in history than in being wise, circumspect and just.

If something sounds extreme, I’d question it. The really trustworthy voices, I think, are not to be found on the extremes, but in the middle, in a balanced weighing of things and calm deliberation.
————
Footnotes
(1) “About – Background and Rationale,” at http://itccs.org/about